Clinical Information Systems
Clinical Information Systems
Clinical Information Systems come in a variety of forms. In this article, I’ll compare the Cerner platform to the “practice fusion” EHR. Practice Fusion is a free electronic health record (EHR) solution for healthcare professionals. “Practice Fusion’s EHR is a full practice management software platform that incorporates charting, scheduling, billing, e-prescribing, lab integrations, and secure messaging,” according to the material provided by Practice Fusion (Badr, 2019). This EHR system is cloud-based, so important data can be backed up. Practice Fusion is the most comprehensive cloud-based application in the United States! The Cerner network, on the other hand, was created to improve the flow of healthcare system data and verify that the correct data is captured. Because management and engagement were lacking, the Cerner platform was created to improve patient management and involvement.
Practice Fusion has a number of benefits, including support. The support is given for no cost. At no additional expense, this can assist providers with any questions. Fusion is secured in practice. They follow HIPPA and privacy compliances and offer industry-leading data and account security. Any medical practitioner should possess these qualities (Alabi, 2021). Practice Fusion also gives you the option of using your current biller or one of their billing partners. This can help a practice make more money. It does, however, have certain disadvantages. One of the most frustrating aspects of PF is that it only imports PDFs of test results and does not allow for any editing of the statistics contained inside these PDFs. I’m able to look at lab data but not graphs. Another disadvantage is that PF is not intuitive when it comes to other system ergonomics.
The Cerner platform’s primary benefit is that it promotes and sustains open data interchange between users and consumers, resulting in a positive health outcome. Another benefit is that the platform integrates with other health IT vendors, assisting in the development of organizational standards that support the developing industries in order to build a common language that allows for the open and secure interchange of health data (Badr, 2019). It allows medical data to be sent across regional borders and across previous hospital divisions. However, it has been regarded as depersonalizing interactions with healthcare personnel, as communicating with the computer takes longer than communicating with the patient. Second, the conversion to medical electricity has a significant start-up and administration cost, which is a threat to any organization ’s mission.
Practice Fusion, in my opinion, is a fantastic EHR. PF provides a very intuitive and easy-to-use interface, which is especially crucial for my department, which is located in a busy local clinic. Since we are an academic teaching environment, we are constantly onboarding new volunteers who need to master this software for the first time. Practice Fusion is completely free, safe, and has a lot of great features. Practice Fusion has also received several accolades. According to the Practice Fusion website, “#1 EHR for Solo and Small Practices,” “150 Top Places to Work in Healthcare,” and “No. 1 EHR for e-Prescribing & Meaningful Use.” The prizes alone demonstrate that this is a fantastic program. EMR systems also employ the PF platform since it aids in the processing of vast amounts of data in healthcare (Alabi, 2021). Any health-care organization should use this EHR system, in my opinion.
References
Alabi, O. (2021). A review on information security of cloud based Electronic Health Record. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3834180
Badr, N. (2019). Guidelines for health it addressing the quality of data in EHR Information Systems. Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006941001690181
